KRT Wire | 06/16/2005 | NAACP criticizes Texas senatorsNAACP criticizes Texas senators
BY TODD J. GILLMAN
The Dallas Morning News
WASHINGTON - (KRT) - The nation's leading civil rights group criticized Texas' senators on Thursday for not co-sponsoring the Senate's apology for its failure to outlaw lynching decades ago.
All but 14 of 100 senators signed onto the resolution of apology, which passed unanimously this week - without objection and without a roll call vote. Neither Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison nor John Cornyn were among the co-sponsors.
"There's clearly a difference between not objecting and working to see to its passage," said Hilary Shelton, director of the NAACP's Washington bureau. "The position they took seems to be one of indifference. If you look at the problem of lynching when it was in its heyday, it was a problem because good people did nothing. ... And they (the Texas senators) did nothing."
Senate records show that 18 of the co-sponsors signed the day the resolution was passed, and seven signed a day or two afterward, taking advantage of a little-used rule. Liberal blogs have excoriated the holdouts, accusing them of insensitivity or overt racism.
The Texas senators, both Republicans, maintain they supported the apology but saw no reason to co-sponsor it.
"You don't need to co-sponsor something to be in favor of it. There's many things that pass the Senate every day that many people don't co-sponsor," said Hutchison spokesman Chris Paulitz. "Sen. Hutchison abhors lynching and believes it was a horrific part of our past - and as we saw with the James Byrd (Jr.) incident, (in) our not too distant past."
In 1998, Byrd, a black man, was chained to a pickup by three white men and dragged to death in Jasper, Texas. Hutchison was the highest-ranking state official at his funeral.
Passage was assured by the time it was circulated to Hutchison's office, Paulitz said, and aides saw no need to urge her to sign, especially since she rarely co-sponsors bills that she didn't help write.
Cornyn spokesman Don Stewart said a number of misguided complaints have reached the office in the past few days, from callers who wanted to know why he supports lynching. Some erroneously believed that he voted against the resolution.
"It was a unanimous vote, and his vote shows that he supported what the resolution said," Stewart said. "Lynching is illegal at the local, state and federal level and has been for a long time. This was a resolution about what the Senate filibustered years ago.{ellipsis}This was supposed to be a somber, sincere reflection on the mistakes of the past, and it's become a political cudgel for some that want to misconstrue the nature of the process."
Cornyn inserted comments of support in the Senate record, calling the "era of widespread lynching in our nation's history deplorable."
According to the NAACP, there were 4,742 documented lynchings in 43 states from 1882 to 1968.
From 1920 to 1940, the U.S. House passed anti-lynching bills three times. But Southern lawmakers choked the proposals in the Senate. Historians and civil rights groups - including the NAACP, founded as a direct response to lynchings - blame the Senate's inaction for later waves of violence and for resistance to voting rights and desegregation.
The resolution of apology was written by Sens. George Allen, a Virginia Republican, and Mary Landrieu, a Louisiana Democrat.